Sunday, February 7, 2010

What are the pros and cons of increased campaign spending?

I know that it's a good thing because the money spent does pay for jobs and salaries, and that it is used to help educate the public more about politicians. But it's bad that the wealthy can donate loads more and have a greater influence on the outcome of the election. That money would be better off going to charity.








Can I hear some more pros and cons?What are the pros and cons of increased campaign spending?
Pro: Even Hitler or Obama can get elected if they have enough money in the US to spend.





Con: That's not goodWhat are the pros and cons of increased campaign spending?
It creates a contest where only the very wealthy can play. BHO, for instance, is the best President that money can buy. He raised about $650,000,000 and out spent McCain 4 to 1. What a guy huh? time will tell who BHO owes for his election; maybe counties, foreign investors etc. Watch, listen and learn who the big game for money, fame and power is played.
  • blonde hair
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment