Sunday, February 7, 2010

Why is it called a smear campaign when obama is questioned on legitimate associations?

when the obama campaign made fun of mccain for not knowing how many houses he owned (because his wife is the legal owner of several, according to their prenup, so he wanted to be accurate) it was a ';legitimate issue'; . when the obama campaign asked if palin opposed the bridge to nowhere (even though he and biden voted for it, and decided against transfering the money to new orelans after katrina) it was ';legitimate';. I think it is great that someone is asking these very legitimate questions. we don't need a radical in the whitehouse.Why is it called a smear campaign when obama is questioned on legitimate associations?
Calling Obama a terrorist is a smear. Saying he is ';palling around with terrorists'; is a smear. Do you think the US government would have allowed him be involved at all in government in the first place if those allegations were true?? Do you really think Obama poses some sort of terrorist threat to the US? If you are remotely intelligent you will answer no to those questions.





I don't want to hear lies about the candidates. I want to hear about what they're going to do to fix the horrible position our country is in right now.Why is it called a smear campaign when obama is questioned on legitimate associations?
This is similar to O.J. calling the detectives who arrested him racists.





Obama's associations are legitimate questions that help us understand his character, his integrity, his patriotism, and his belief system.





Combine the above questions with his lack of experience and accomplishments, and we are being given a most unsuitable person for CIC of the USA.





Btw, if it weren't Barack Hussein Obama, and instead a junior Senator from Illinois, say, a William Michael McCoy (a fair complexioned fellow with more mainstream beliefs), does anyone believe that the leftist, liberal base that cpntrols the Democratic party and the liberal MSM have promoted him so strongly?





(Does anyone believe that the power controlling elite of the Democratic party represent blue collar Americans anymore???)





Isn't Joe Biden for that matter, a much more qualified and capable candidate for the Democratic nominee for POTUS?
No... we need another brainless redneck with her cowboy diplomacy and a doddering old fart who is incapable of using a cell phone, sending an e-mail, or using the toilet without a nurse present.





Obama's ';association'; was merely that he once served on the same board with a man who over 40 years ago was considered to be a radical by the FBI... the same organization what was at the time headed by a cross-dressing racist by the name of J. Edgar Hoover.





Obama's camp is raising issues while Palin and her Tina Few glasses are drawing at weak straws to inflict irrational fear into voters too dumb to know an issue if it fell out of the sky.





This is why I think there should be a mandatory IQ test before you become a registered voter. It would help keep idiotic rubes who have no idea what the real issue is from voting for another idiot because they were scared into it.
What questions on legitimate associations are you referring to?





Are you referring to the questions asking him if he's a Muslim? Or what about the questions asking him if his church is racist because white people hardly attend? Or what about the questions asking him if he's a terrorist? Smears, all smears.
McGeezer didn't want to be ';Accurate'; he did not want to answer the ?. If McLIAR wants to be accurate how about he tells everyone that Ayres was found NOT GUILTY back when Obama was 8 YES 8 YEARS OLD! Now he is a well respected collage professor and community leader. Should the truth include that info,or was it just meant to be a smear? McBush very obviously put his campaign before his country when he picked a total DING BAT as his VP just to get the few Hillary supporters who blew a douche when Obama didn't pick her. Look into McAIENIS`s eyes ,he looks like the devil entered into his body and is keeping him alive. Why are the repubs such SHEEP?
Obama is a dangerous variable; anyone will know it, but people are afraid of being called racist if they do.





Americans, you do not realize the severity of this; you may not love McCain, but Obama is dangerous. Just think of how little is known about him, after all this time in the public eye.
Amen brother!! All I can say is that I feel like a weight has been lifted off my chest. I was wondering when the McCain campaign was going to stop jackin' around and being up these very important issues. The Obama campaign are running around in a frenzy right now. I guess what's good for the goose is good for the gander?
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama expressed regret late Friday for his 2005 land purchase from now-indicted political fundraiser Antoin ';Tony'; Rezko in a deal that enlarged the senator's yard.





';I consider this a mistake on my part and I regret it,'; Obama told the Chicago Sun-Times in an exclusive and revealing question-and-answer exchange about the transaction.


http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/12鈥?/a>
Tenuous, minimal ties to people is not like going to bat for a friend like Charles Keating to try to protect him from financial regulators as John did.....





We need something SOLID on Obama, like the Keating Five, not recycled e-mail smears.
Obama and company do not want any investigation into his past.. they do not want anything negative said about him.. and they don't like questions.





This says to me.. that when someone is that secretive, they have something to hide.. and I do think he has.
The Obama camp wants to throw the punches but they don't want to get punched. I read on Yahoo's home page a day or two ago that the Obama camp was warning McCain to stop the smears. It just goes to show you their double standard.
He's not being ';questioned'; - Palin is exaggerating the truth for her own agenda, therefore becoming a smear.





These are old stories that have already been addressed many, many times.
Because the media is undoubtedly liberal so they have already labeled this as a smear when really it is valid questioning of someones character and judgment.
because instead of finding their apponents issues to throw back at them the candidates think its better to throw dirt..i would rather hear about the pros and cons of each others political issues and of course ''changes''
You can't question cry baby Obama. The little pansy starts having a hissy fit and ';won't stand for it.'; Freakin' hypocritical lying socialist pig.
You need to get your fact straight. Almost everything you said is totally bogus starting with the pre-nup that you mentioned. It goes down hill after that.
Because Obama doesn't want people to know about those associations. Main stream America would not accept them (and rightfully so).
You make a good point with this question. I assume the liberals are calling it a smear because it is impossible for them to be rational about their candidate.
I'd like to ask Obama about his work in ACORN and his endorsement of Stroger in Chicago among other things, but it doesn't seem like many Obama supporters want to hear it.
because obviosuly he is not a terrorist and when only little soundbites get picked up in the news, it becomes an intentinoal smear
They'll just spin it or avoid it all together. If they tell the truth they'll lose the election.
Because anything that's true but negative about Obama is automatically labeled ';smear';.
I guess it depends on who's bringing up the issues.
Yawn,





Another child left behind heard from!





Thanks for the 2-points - troll!






He will have his prosecutors imprision you for your question.
because his mother had a smear test.
  • blonde hair
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment