What is the Clinton campaign strategy to win?

Im not sure now how Hillary plans to win the nomination. Can someone explain how she believes she is going to win? Is it realistic?What is the Clinton campaign strategy to win?
By destroy Obama and bloody him up and making him look unelectable. I think Hilary has been playing the race card. The white card. She knows there are a lot of white racist who will never look for a black man. So she is appealing to these voters. Plus, lying and cheating. Hilary has been trying to change the rules when the game been played.What is the Clinton campaign strategy to win?
By any means necessary.
After eight years of George Bush, it won't take much strategy to beat John McCain. She'll just show she's tough and won't back down from the Republicans, which I think she has already done.
She has over $107 million.


There aren't that many superdelegates.
Uh, get more votes than the other guy?





I know, I know, it's a crazy idea....
Pull a ';Vince Foster'; on Barack Obama.
Lying, cheating, and stealing.
Whatever it takes, including the ';discovery'; of details about Obama that will cause supporters to abandon him.
She hangs on and wins most of the remaining primaries, including PA, IN and NC. She courts the superdelegates. She stretches the whole thing out as long as she can and hopes that some super-Reszko-Wright comes out of the woodwork and tanks Obama's campaign before she's forced to withdraw.
I keep hearing that the Clinton campaign has a bomb that would destroy Obama but are reluctant to play it now fearing it would backfire on them. They hope the media will break it, but they will have to as a last resort. I know that the Republicans think Obama has a glass jaw and they aim to break it in the campaign. If she wins PA, KY, IN, and NC she will have a shot.
Break the rules, or make new ones up.
Their strategy is to lie until it hurts. Bigger and better lies: that's the key to winning!
1. She bribes and intimidates the democratic party to allow the Fla. and Mich. votes to count, regardless of the rules.


2. She scares the old people to believe she is the only candidate who can handle sniper fire at airports and everyone will take away their social security unless she is elected president.


3. Obama will be painted as a left-left wing democrat who cannot unite the party, so regardless of the public vote and the super delegates she will declare herself queen...er...zsar.....uhhh....president.鈥?nominee.
Hi Gale,





Hillary is promoting herself by saying that she is the candidate who has done the most for Americans. Not only has she done numerous things for education, she has also been an advocate for children and families.





She is separating herself by stating that she has been working for American people for years. Obama is the celebrity candidate. He has unlimited $$. He is also very pro affirmative action.





Hillary is for Americans, especially those without. Barrack is for black Americans.





She believes she is going to win, because she has many supporters. Her downfall is her finance for the campaign. Unfortunately, she doesn't have Oprah paying her way.





It's realistic, because campaigns can go up and down at any moment.
How could she win?





She would need a big win in PA, a couple percentage points wont do it, she needs to win by alot or its time to drop out of the race.





She needs to pull a suprise win somewhere in one of the small states.





She needs to keep the rest of them close.





If that happens whe will go into the convention down some pledged delegates but both candidates need super delegates at that point, and she simply needs to get enough superdelegates to clear 2035.


Her other chance is if niether get 2035, at that point there is no such thing as a pledged delegate, anyone could enter the race and who ever gets 2035 votes first wins.





Are her chances realistic?


Could happen, doubt it will happen but it could - stranger things have happened in elections.


At this point a brokered convention is the most realistic outcome, which means we might not see either candidate win the nomination. What will happen in a brokered convention is anyone's guess.
Unfortunately for the Democrats, she may not be able to win the nomination. Obama has refused to let Florida and Michigan count unless he can steal a 50/50 split he didn't win in Florida, and he torpedoed the Michigan revote proposal because he knew he'd lose there. The Democrats' reliance on caucuses (did we ever hold a caucus to select an actual president in November? Hello!), and its quaint habit of apportioning delegates other than winner-take-all, as we do in national elections, virtually guarantees that they will ordain Obama in '08. The problem is that Obama wins places like Missisissippi, Nebraska and Idaho, which will go red in the fall, and Hillary wins the big states and almost all the swing states the Dems have to have in November to win. Yet Hillary comes up short because the process is demented. Superdelegates are supposed to act as a brake on the nonsensical outcomes the nominating process can produce, but we have Barack, Dean and crew insinuating that superdelegates should go with the winner of the most primaries, even the primaries of states that have not voted Democratic since 1964. If the superdelegates did their job of preventing another McGovern, we'd have Hillary as the nominee. Instead, they will be as naive as Barack's groupies and will think that the right-wing cable shows that are pummeling Hillary every minute aren't just trying to leave the Dems with the eminently unelectable Obama. Once those Swiftboaters for Truth get hold of Barack's pastor and a few other choice tidbits, and run with 527 ads everywhere, it's over. A shortness of substance AND some hateful speech will coalesce to make McCain look less dangerous.