How do i unlock the time trial feature on mirrors edge with out completing the campaign? For x-box360 by the wayHow to unlock mirrors edge time trial version with out completing the campaign?
Time Trial is already unlocked when you buy the game. All you need to do is create an account on the EA website [ https://profile.ea.com/acctcreate.do?reg鈥?/a> ]. You don't need to subscribe to anyone or anything, just create an account for free.
Then go to back to your 360, get to the main menu of Mirror's Edge, and select Time Trial. It will ask you for your email and password that you used for the EA account registration. Enter that into the fields provided.
Now you're in Time Trial mode! Some of the maps are already unlocked for you, but others need to be unlocked by either beating a qualifying time for another Time Trial map, or by beating certain levels in the campaign.
If you are talking about level Speed Runs however, then I can't help you there. Those can only be unlocked by completing the whole campaign.How to unlock mirrors edge time trial version with out completing the campaign?
Im not sure you can do that. That game is cool though, but i have died like 4656231687 times....
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Why did McCain suspend his campaign instead of turning it over to Sarah Palin?
Isn't that what a VP does: step in for the President when the President is busy or unable?
It's not like McCain will be gone a long time - they're trying hard to get this bailout bill hammered out before next week. Why did McCain suspend his campaign instead of just letting Sarah Palin handle it on her own for a couple of days?Why did McCain suspend his campaign instead of turning it over to Sarah Palin?
If by campaigning you mean giving speeches and doing interviews then the answer is simple. If you saw the Katie Couric interview with Sarah Palin, you would have seen how terribly she got rocked. Couric grilled her pretty hard but Palin's answers were just cliched ';McCain is a maverick who isn't afraid of the heat'; answers. It seems no one even gave her a crash course on the history of any major legislation her running mate was a part of. It was like watching your 5 year old sister choke at a spelling bee. You just want to kick over the mic and try to save her from the embarrassment.
Campaign aids are probably thinking damage control rather than letter her take the reigns. But hey....Shes got a great smile?
Why did McCain suspend his campaign instead of turning it over to Sarah Palin?
It i9s a political ploy. In addition, she is not ready to do much campaigning as witnessed by the poor performance in the interview with Kate Kurack (sp) . Part of the ploy is that McCain wanted to postpone Friday's debate so he could have it replace the Palin debate that takes place the following Thursday. Bush was in on it by asking for the meeting on the same day of the debate where he could have easily done it on Thursday (which pretty much finally happen) or on Saturday. If he didn't have the ploy in mind, he would have just done both like Obama did the meeting on Thursday.
Palin is totally incompetent and not the brightest! she is brash and ambitious though, which makes up for her lack of knowledge, honesty, and common sense. she is good at reading speeches that were prepared before she was even in the picture. Americans will soon realize how shallow and inadequate she is! McCain wouldn't even trust her to take the reigns for a couple of days preferring to shut it off! wow...She is a air head! That simple! INADEQUATE! VERY INADEQUATE!
Although McCain thought people would see him as parachuting in and riding to the rescue, when he got to Washington both parties told him to go away. Didn't work any better than the same scheme did with Hurricane Gustav.
But his real goal was to reschedule the debate (which his ads in the Wall Street Journal that morning already said he had won ';hands down'; even had some quotes...) so that the VP debate would be delayed, probably not happen at all. Palin has scared the carp out of McCain and the RNC, with her witches, voodoo dolls and whatever, the two investigations (that we know of) either one of which may result in her impeachment as Gov. of Alaska, and her interview the other day where she was clueless and came across not as uninformed but as stupid.
Looking at his goal, McCain lost big time.
Since I see the usual Republican supporters using their usual nonsensical defenses, here's an idea that might seem radical only because it's so obvious no one bothered to think of it. (And it's nonpartisan as well, as a bonus!)
Why don't we let the VP candidates slug it out first? Biden and Palin first, then all presidential debates after that.
Sarah Palin can't find her *** with both hands, a map, GPS and a team of Sherpas; letting her handle the campaign would be political suicide and McCain's handlers are having a rough enough time trying to make her look less out-of-her-league than she is.
Here is why
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/loc鈥?/a>
He didn't suspend anything other then his ads
The campaign offices are all still open and working
If Palin takes over, the race would be over before the election
You would think! but Sarah Palin is still busy kicking herself after the Catie Couric interview.
Palin can barely form a logical sentence
If she were VP and he was president, that would be the case
But they arent yet
ABSOFRIGGIN'LUTELY. Is the vice candidate unavailabe?
Because McCain is busy being an actual Senator and is helping to bring a solution to the economic crisis we are facing. While Obama, the man of ';change'; and ';hope'; is still out there campaigning and doing what he normally does as a Senator, which is nothing. Politics as usual with him. He's only showing he's not part of the solution.
Perhaps because in times like these, they shouldn't be campaigning, and they should be working. Why doesn't Hussein understand that? He is jumping in to butt heads and get things doneblonde hair
It's not like McCain will be gone a long time - they're trying hard to get this bailout bill hammered out before next week. Why did McCain suspend his campaign instead of just letting Sarah Palin handle it on her own for a couple of days?Why did McCain suspend his campaign instead of turning it over to Sarah Palin?
If by campaigning you mean giving speeches and doing interviews then the answer is simple. If you saw the Katie Couric interview with Sarah Palin, you would have seen how terribly she got rocked. Couric grilled her pretty hard but Palin's answers were just cliched ';McCain is a maverick who isn't afraid of the heat'; answers. It seems no one even gave her a crash course on the history of any major legislation her running mate was a part of. It was like watching your 5 year old sister choke at a spelling bee. You just want to kick over the mic and try to save her from the embarrassment.
Campaign aids are probably thinking damage control rather than letter her take the reigns. But hey....Shes got a great smile?
Why did McCain suspend his campaign instead of turning it over to Sarah Palin?
It i9s a political ploy. In addition, she is not ready to do much campaigning as witnessed by the poor performance in the interview with Kate Kurack (sp) . Part of the ploy is that McCain wanted to postpone Friday's debate so he could have it replace the Palin debate that takes place the following Thursday. Bush was in on it by asking for the meeting on the same day of the debate where he could have easily done it on Thursday (which pretty much finally happen) or on Saturday. If he didn't have the ploy in mind, he would have just done both like Obama did the meeting on Thursday.
Palin is totally incompetent and not the brightest! she is brash and ambitious though, which makes up for her lack of knowledge, honesty, and common sense. she is good at reading speeches that were prepared before she was even in the picture. Americans will soon realize how shallow and inadequate she is! McCain wouldn't even trust her to take the reigns for a couple of days preferring to shut it off! wow...She is a air head! That simple! INADEQUATE! VERY INADEQUATE!
Although McCain thought people would see him as parachuting in and riding to the rescue, when he got to Washington both parties told him to go away. Didn't work any better than the same scheme did with Hurricane Gustav.
But his real goal was to reschedule the debate (which his ads in the Wall Street Journal that morning already said he had won ';hands down'; even had some quotes...) so that the VP debate would be delayed, probably not happen at all. Palin has scared the carp out of McCain and the RNC, with her witches, voodoo dolls and whatever, the two investigations (that we know of) either one of which may result in her impeachment as Gov. of Alaska, and her interview the other day where she was clueless and came across not as uninformed but as stupid.
Looking at his goal, McCain lost big time.
Since I see the usual Republican supporters using their usual nonsensical defenses, here's an idea that might seem radical only because it's so obvious no one bothered to think of it. (And it's nonpartisan as well, as a bonus!)
Why don't we let the VP candidates slug it out first? Biden and Palin first, then all presidential debates after that.
Sarah Palin can't find her *** with both hands, a map, GPS and a team of Sherpas; letting her handle the campaign would be political suicide and McCain's handlers are having a rough enough time trying to make her look less out-of-her-league than she is.
Here is why
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/loc鈥?/a>
He didn't suspend anything other then his ads
The campaign offices are all still open and working
If Palin takes over, the race would be over before the election
You would think! but Sarah Palin is still busy kicking herself after the Catie Couric interview.
Palin can barely form a logical sentence
If she were VP and he was president, that would be the case
But they arent yet
ABSOFRIGGIN'LUTELY. Is the vice candidate unavailabe?
Because McCain is busy being an actual Senator and is helping to bring a solution to the economic crisis we are facing. While Obama, the man of ';change'; and ';hope'; is still out there campaigning and doing what he normally does as a Senator, which is nothing. Politics as usual with him. He's only showing he's not part of the solution.
Perhaps because in times like these, they shouldn't be campaigning, and they should be working. Why doesn't Hussein understand that? He is jumping in to butt heads and get things done
Why are the presidential candidates excused from thier job in congress to campaign?
Why are they not doing thier job instead of campaigning? We have a great problem with a do-nothing government and they should be in congress making a difference. Let thier records as government officials do the talking for them rather than have them not do thier job while they try to win a popularity contest... ACTION NOT WORDS.Why are the presidential candidates excused from thier job in congress to campaign?
It's not the actual record that counts. It's the intent and promise.
Sheeeez. Don't you know anything?Why are the presidential candidates excused from thier job in congress to campaign?
You're right. We should vote for former Senators such as Fred Thompson. Or former mayors such as Rudy G.
Would you put the same conditions on a President running for re-election? Should the President be prevented from campaigning and let someone snatch the office away?
Provision is made for candidates to be briefed on the issues and cast their votes while campaigning.
Campaigning is an integral part of all congresspersons term in office.
Good question!
Every Presidential campaign we hear this same thing from people. And every Presidential campaign it is explained that they are not excused from their jobs. They return to the Hill for important votes and measures. There is a dedicated staff that keeps them up to date on everything happening in their absence and they still put forth bills and they still monitor their states.
Actually, technically, I don't believe that they are 'excused from their jobs'. They are still responsible to do their jobs. It's just that they usually DON'T do a very good job while they're campaigning, I would wager. Our presidents must come from somewhere - I wouldn't say that congress members shouldn't be allowed to run, but it is a tight line to walk to still do your job and to run for president too.
Interesting how they all say, I am working hard to... instead of I'm hardly working!
Technically they're not. They are suppose to be voting on bills, researching the issue, etc...
Great question, and I wish I had a good answer.
They aren't. No senator has won the presidency since 1960. They are punished at the polls for daring to run while still in office.
I dunno if the democrats can break that streak, but most senators running for office are wasting time.
It's not the actual record that counts. It's the intent and promise.
Sheeeez. Don't you know anything?Why are the presidential candidates excused from thier job in congress to campaign?
You're right. We should vote for former Senators such as Fred Thompson. Or former mayors such as Rudy G.
Would you put the same conditions on a President running for re-election? Should the President be prevented from campaigning and let someone snatch the office away?
Provision is made for candidates to be briefed on the issues and cast their votes while campaigning.
Campaigning is an integral part of all congresspersons term in office.
Good question!
Every Presidential campaign we hear this same thing from people. And every Presidential campaign it is explained that they are not excused from their jobs. They return to the Hill for important votes and measures. There is a dedicated staff that keeps them up to date on everything happening in their absence and they still put forth bills and they still monitor their states.
Actually, technically, I don't believe that they are 'excused from their jobs'. They are still responsible to do their jobs. It's just that they usually DON'T do a very good job while they're campaigning, I would wager. Our presidents must come from somewhere - I wouldn't say that congress members shouldn't be allowed to run, but it is a tight line to walk to still do your job and to run for president too.
Interesting how they all say, I am working hard to... instead of I'm hardly working!
Technically they're not. They are suppose to be voting on bills, researching the issue, etc...
Great question, and I wish I had a good answer.
They aren't. No senator has won the presidency since 1960. They are punished at the polls for daring to run while still in office.
I dunno if the democrats can break that streak, but most senators running for office are wasting time.
When can i start selling campaign 19 of avon and when is the money due?
when i go on my website and try to submit my order for campaign 19 it says this action is not allowed for future order.so when can i place this order?When can i start selling campaign 19 of avon and when is the money due?
You start selling the next campaign right after you place your campaign 18 order. I believe campaign 19 is due, on the internet, by Monday Sept 7 12:00 central time. The money for campaign 19 is due I think when you go to place your campaign 20 order. I just recently started selling Avon again so it's been a while for me.
You start selling the next campaign right after you place your campaign 18 order. I believe campaign 19 is due, on the internet, by Monday Sept 7 12:00 central time. The money for campaign 19 is due I think when you go to place your campaign 20 order. I just recently started selling Avon again so it's been a while for me.
US Proposition 1. Breaking a campaign promise should carry the death penalty for the official who does it?
How would you vote? YES or NO
If you would amend the proposition, then how?US Proposition 1. Breaking a campaign promise should carry the death penalty for the official who does it?
I'd vote yes, but that would mean the mass execution of every politician ever elected.US Proposition 1. Breaking a campaign promise should carry the death penalty for the official who does it?
No. Nobody who campaigns can make actual promises. The legislative process isn't set up that way. People who vote on a campaign promise are not very intelligent in thinking that any politician has the power to promise anything at all other than to do his job honestly and above board and to say what he would like for his administration. Many people vote on legislation that are not all on the same page.
While I think that there should be more accountability from our elected officials, come on the death penalty. If you notice with President Obama, He made numerous statements and promises, then when he was elected the secret service informed him of how it really was. National security stops us from truly knowing all that is going on, and honestly would scare the heck out of a lot of people. I notice how after his briefing he basically went with what Senator Cain had been promoting all along. You also have to consider that some elected officials do try but can't because of other constituents. How about we just execute the ones that are found to be crooked or cheating on their taxes, while increasing ours.
We also might include legislators that increase their wages and their employees wages while raising our taxes. We do with less while they grab more.
I vote NO. A vote yes would be a vote for anarchy, as nearly all elected officials would have to be executed.
NO That would raise the stakes of ';gotcha'; to new heights. But on the other hand it would all but remove the repugnicants from the political scene.
Then everyone who runs for office would receive the death penalty
love it. then we can get new people to run are country.
If you would amend the proposition, then how?US Proposition 1. Breaking a campaign promise should carry the death penalty for the official who does it?
I'd vote yes, but that would mean the mass execution of every politician ever elected.US Proposition 1. Breaking a campaign promise should carry the death penalty for the official who does it?
No. Nobody who campaigns can make actual promises. The legislative process isn't set up that way. People who vote on a campaign promise are not very intelligent in thinking that any politician has the power to promise anything at all other than to do his job honestly and above board and to say what he would like for his administration. Many people vote on legislation that are not all on the same page.
While I think that there should be more accountability from our elected officials, come on the death penalty. If you notice with President Obama, He made numerous statements and promises, then when he was elected the secret service informed him of how it really was. National security stops us from truly knowing all that is going on, and honestly would scare the heck out of a lot of people. I notice how after his briefing he basically went with what Senator Cain had been promoting all along. You also have to consider that some elected officials do try but can't because of other constituents. How about we just execute the ones that are found to be crooked or cheating on their taxes, while increasing ours.
We also might include legislators that increase their wages and their employees wages while raising our taxes. We do with less while they grab more.
I vote NO. A vote yes would be a vote for anarchy, as nearly all elected officials would have to be executed.
NO That would raise the stakes of ';gotcha'; to new heights. But on the other hand it would all but remove the repugnicants from the political scene.
Then everyone who runs for office would receive the death penalty
love it. then we can get new people to run are country.
Where can I go to find out where congressmen are getting campaign contributions?
I am upset and quite frankly irate with the way our media covers politics (or anything for that matter). So I am planning on starting my own newspaper with a few friends from high school soon. My question is this, my first article will deal with congressmen receiving donations and contributions from big Health insurance and pharmaceutical industries, conglomerates, etc. Where can I find how much money was donated, to who, and when? They have to keep records of that stuff, right?Where can I go to find out where congressmen are getting campaign contributions?
opensecrets.org or .com I forget which.
This is on point as well: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul200鈥?/a>
The health industry was giving at a rate of 1.4 MILLION PER DAY and Obama isn't letting people see white house visitor logs. People speculate this is so the public can't track how much time he is spending with insurance companies and big pharma companies.
Why don't you also look at Ron Paul's private health savings accounts and tax credits, HR 1495 the `Comprehensive Health Care Reform Act of 2009' ? If govt wanted to drive down costs that would be the way to go because it removes a big part if ins and govt from the picture letting individuals manage their own accounts.
Even if govt added a subsidy element by making the tax credits like the earned income credit (a subsidy if you make below a certain level) or adds a true catestrophic care/preexisting care coverage, these plans would be for the people, not for special interests.
Take care.Where can I go to find out where congressmen are getting campaign contributions?
A website called opensecrects.
opensecrets.org or .com I forget which.
This is on point as well: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul200鈥?/a>
The health industry was giving at a rate of 1.4 MILLION PER DAY and Obama isn't letting people see white house visitor logs. People speculate this is so the public can't track how much time he is spending with insurance companies and big pharma companies.
Why don't you also look at Ron Paul's private health savings accounts and tax credits, HR 1495 the `Comprehensive Health Care Reform Act of 2009' ? If govt wanted to drive down costs that would be the way to go because it removes a big part if ins and govt from the picture letting individuals manage their own accounts.
Even if govt added a subsidy element by making the tax credits like the earned income credit (a subsidy if you make below a certain level) or adds a true catestrophic care/preexisting care coverage, these plans would be for the people, not for special interests.
Take care.Where can I go to find out where congressmen are getting campaign contributions?
A website called opensecrects.
What happens to donated campaign money of candidates as candidates drop out of the race for presidency?
Do candidates get to keep any of the money or other forms of gifts?
Can any of the money go toward the federal deficit or at least to offset benefits and salaries of our national leaders?What happens to donated campaign money of candidates as candidates drop out of the race for presidency?
The Federal Election Commission has strict regulations as to what can be done with unused campaign donations.
According to the Federal Election Commission, there is a law called the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act. That law takes $3 from every willing income tax filer and puts it in a big fund. Candidates who meet minimum requirements, then receive matching funds.
The FEC stipulates that any candidate is allowed to retain his or her money for a future election once they decide to call it quits in any given election.
FEC stipulates that a presidential candidate can donate his money to a non-profit organization of his choosing so long as it has 501 (c) tax status. That includes special interest groups. That candidate may donate to organizations ranging from the National Rifle Association to MoveOn.org.
The FEC also states a presidential candidate can donate his funds to another campaign committee. So if you donated to an underdog candidate or pay federal income tax, there is a pretty healthy chance that you have bankrolled one of the top tier candidates, again whether you support that candidate or not.What happens to donated campaign money of candidates as candidates drop out of the race for presidency?
Nope they spend it on lavish gifts for their backers, lobbiest, and promoters.
At the federal election level, I'm not sure. I assume they have to either relinquish the money to their party's general fund or make a documented donation to a charity.
But, from what I've heard at the city level, the candidates running for an at-large office, for instance, keep the money they raise, since a position in city council is not under the auspices of any given party.
This is what a losing candidate from the recent Lansing City Council run told me. Of course, it would seem more scrupulous to return the donations, but since a candidate most likely used a lot of it for running newspaper ads, organizing an campaign office and traveling, there might not be much left over to return all donor's contributions in full.
Can any of the money go toward the federal deficit or at least to offset benefits and salaries of our national leaders?What happens to donated campaign money of candidates as candidates drop out of the race for presidency?
The Federal Election Commission has strict regulations as to what can be done with unused campaign donations.
According to the Federal Election Commission, there is a law called the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act. That law takes $3 from every willing income tax filer and puts it in a big fund. Candidates who meet minimum requirements, then receive matching funds.
The FEC stipulates that any candidate is allowed to retain his or her money for a future election once they decide to call it quits in any given election.
FEC stipulates that a presidential candidate can donate his money to a non-profit organization of his choosing so long as it has 501 (c) tax status. That includes special interest groups. That candidate may donate to organizations ranging from the National Rifle Association to MoveOn.org.
The FEC also states a presidential candidate can donate his funds to another campaign committee. So if you donated to an underdog candidate or pay federal income tax, there is a pretty healthy chance that you have bankrolled one of the top tier candidates, again whether you support that candidate or not.What happens to donated campaign money of candidates as candidates drop out of the race for presidency?
Nope they spend it on lavish gifts for their backers, lobbiest, and promoters.
At the federal election level, I'm not sure. I assume they have to either relinquish the money to their party's general fund or make a documented donation to a charity.
But, from what I've heard at the city level, the candidates running for an at-large office, for instance, keep the money they raise, since a position in city council is not under the auspices of any given party.
This is what a losing candidate from the recent Lansing City Council run told me. Of course, it would seem more scrupulous to return the donations, but since a candidate most likely used a lot of it for running newspaper ads, organizing an campaign office and traveling, there might not be much left over to return all donor's contributions in full.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)